<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Chow &#8211; Dot Com Mogul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internet-business.com/59.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internet-business.com/59.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:04:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.internet-business.com/59.htm/comment-page-1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internet-business.com/john-chow-dot-com-mogul/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>John has continued to build his site to greater levels of success and profitability, despite the digg ban. He has a track record of running a reputable tech website long before digg was even started. I dont see a problem with the ban, but I just think they could have pointed out where he was going wrong and what kind of stories they did not like, how he could perhaps stop those articles from being dugg. And be allowed to have his site reinstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John has continued to build his site to greater levels of success and profitability, despite the digg ban. He has a track record of running a reputable tech website long before digg was even started. I dont see a problem with the ban, but I just think they could have pointed out where he was going wrong and what kind of stories they did not like, how he could perhaps stop those articles from being dugg. And be allowed to have his site reinstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevG</title>
		<link>http://www.internet-business.com/59.htm/comment-page-1#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>RevG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internet-business.com/john-chow-dot-com-mogul/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>&quot;After all, it is quality sites like johnchow.com that give valuable exposure to digg, the traffic is not all just one way.&quot;

Right On! You have made an astute observation and I totally agree. Digg was benefitting from John driving traffic to them and they have now cut off their nose to spite their face. This is the best point of view on the affair I&#039;ve seen yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After all, it is quality sites like johnchow.com that give valuable exposure to digg, the traffic is not all just one way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right On! You have made an astute observation and I totally agree. Digg was benefitting from John driving traffic to them and they have now cut off their nose to spite their face. This is the best point of view on the affair I&#8217;ve seen yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review My Blog - Batch 21 &#171; John Chow dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.internet-business.com/59.htm/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Review My Blog - Batch 21 &#171; John Chow dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internet-business.com/john-chow-dot-com-mogul/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet Business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet Business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
